Almost 700,000 European students are enrolled in universities outside their countries of origin – not for an exchange period, but for the entire duration of their degree or PhD courses. Many move to the UK (Brexit will impact on this aspect too ), but also Austria, Switzerland, and Denmark attract significant numbers of international students. To understand the import of the phenomenon, just consider that the number of students who move temporarily in the framework of the Erasmus+ programme is about 300.000 per year. Which factors shape these choices, and what are the obstacles for European students coming from non-member states?
Obstacles for the students from the “periphery”
South-East Europe is an interesting case as far as student mobility is concerned, both because of the size of the flows and because the region is a closed system, mostly characterised by intra-regional flows. Its students tend to move much more than the EU average – they make up for almost a third of the European students enrolling abroad. Their choice is often determined by the limited number of top-class universities in the region, which is rather flooded with poor quality institutions , managed by the private sector without adequate public control. However, there are also other financial and cultural factors at play.
Despite the strong demand for better educational opportunities abroad, there are many obstacles hindering them. While within the EU students are free to enroll in a different country and receive the same treatment as local students under all accounts, for those from outside the EU everything is more complicated: higher fees, more bureaucracy, and – unless there are bilateral agreements – limited access to scholarships and accommodation.
As the data show, EU citizenship really makes a difference for South-East European students wishing to go abroad. Among those coming from EU member states, only 23% stay in the region. The figure doubles (45%) for those who are not EU citizens. When looking at the opposite phenomenon, i.e. students from the rest of the continent moving to South-East Europe, the main beneficiaries are EU member states such as Romania, Bulgaria, and Greece – while the other countries struggle to attract students.
South-East Europe: inbound and outbound student flows
The graphic shows the relation between inbound and outbound students in the region. Single flows can be selected and deselected by clicking on the single voices | Source: Elaboration by OBCT on the latest available data by Eurostat, UNESCO, and OSCE; data provide a snapshot and refer to 2015 for most of the countries. Data on Kosovo and on students moving to Montenegro are not available.
A missed opportunity?
The positive impact of student mobility has long been acknowledged and promoted in Europe: studying abroad fosters education, language skills, cross-cultural contacts, and job opportunities. This vision led to the creation of the European Higher Education Area and of the Erasmus+ programme. By 2020, the EU aims at bringing to 20% the percentage of university students spending time abroad, either for education or training.
However, South-East European students tend to get less benefits from international mobility, as they mostly move within their own region – most flows connect countries that are already very close in terms of language and culture. Exchanges often take place according to the state of the relationships in the area, with bilateral agreements making funds and places available for neighbour foreigners. For instance, many Bosnian-Serb students move to Serbia.
Paradoxically, these dynamics may end up reducing – rather than fostering – the opportunities impied by cultural exchange. At the same time however, intra-regional mobility might be seen as a way to reconciliat